The first observation that comes to mind is related to the delay in the implementation of a right, or rather, the enjoyment of a right, guaranteed in peremptory terms by the Constitution, which has been in force since 1946. The participation of employees in the company's profits is not included in the Constitution as a merely programmatic provision, like so many others that we come across in it, or as a simple promise. It is more than this. It is included there as a right , which the Constitution guarantees in imperative terms, by enunciating an order, a determination, to the ordinary legislator. This is what follows from the text of art. 157, IV, which is worth remembering:
“Labor and social security legislation shall comply with the buy bulk sms israel following precepts, in addition to others aimed at improving the conditions of workers:…
IV) mandatory and direct participation of the worker in the company's profits, under the terms and in the manner determined by law”.
As can be seen, there is a guaranteed right, the enjoyment of which must be regulated by supplementary ordinary law, but, of course, without altering or frustrating the constitutional mandate. If this right has been guaranteed by the Constitution since 1946 and, to this day, the worker has not really enjoyed it, this fact has some meaning, it expresses something that must be identified.
Employee Participation in Company Profits
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:30 am