Product performance comparing results

[sujonkumar6300]

Of progressive and regressive testing

Effort spent on defect removal and associated costs (corrections, rework, defect analysis, etc.)
Number and cost of errors that reach production
Estimated savings in maintenance
A natural expectation when implementing a model such as CMMI is that it will improve the development process and, implicitly, also improve the quality of the product. However, even when this seems to have a Pakistan Mobile Database certain logic, this is not always the case. Perhaps to a large extent because the main hidden objective that certain organizations pursue is not focused on obtaining an improvement in their processes as such, but simply on obtaining better credentials to sell. Which is not exactly bad, but it should lead us to evaluate how well we are applying our corporate strategies in relation to what we seek in the medium and long term.

Therefore, it would be expected that the systematic application of a Specialized Quality Model for Testing would contribute greatly to improving the quality of a software product; and if this testing model (TMMi) in turn is one that contains areas and practices aligned to those managed by the development model that we or our clients have adopted (CMMI), it will pave the way for us, even when it involves the application of a testing process based on its predecessor model TMM, or even on some other testing model that handles similar areas.