Implementation of BIM and transition to Revit

Description of your first forum.
Post Reply
thouhidul32
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:31 am

Implementation of BIM and transition to Revit

Post by thouhidul32 »

The documentation was designed manually, which increased the risk of errors and inaccuracies. The designers actively used plugins like VetCAD++, but even this did not relieve them of manual labor. As a result, they encountered various problems:

Documentation was often formatted in a non-standard style, making it difficult to check and coordinate saudi arabia email list between sections.
Assignments for holes were “lost” due to different approaches to the development of very similar sections of the AR and KR
It is impossible to carry out automatic checks for intersections of structural elements due to the lack of a basis for their implementation in the form of a BIM model

Image

To unify work processes and reduce the number of errors, a plan was developed to transfer designers to work in Revit, which was already actively used by architects. The transition strategy was divided into several stages:

1. Approval of the test project

The transition to the new system could not be implemented in full at once. First, the head of the department had to agree with the management on the possibility of developing a test project of the KR section in Revit at the RD stage. It was important to identify all potential problems at the testing stage in order to avoid them in the future when working with large projects. As a result, a standard slab became the starting point for mastering the new methodology.

2. Selecting a template

The basis for the work was a Revit template, already adapted for designers. The choice in favor of this option was obvious, since it was already used by architects. This means that coordination and interaction between departments would be significantly accelerated.

3. Develop a test project and identify potential problems

It was necessary to find the maximum number of potential errors: from design to development of families.

4. Issuance and approval of documentation within the bureau

In the REMARK case, the following acted as approval authorities: the head of the design team, the quality controller, and the calculation engineer.

All these specialists were not against the implementation, but they approached this process demandingly and uncompromisingly.

Unification of work results
At the final stage, the obtained developments in the form of a KR template for Revit, family libraries, etc. were collected together for use in new projects.
Post Reply