This last is the new situation that will require a particular legal definition

[sujonkumar6300]

In other words, if a court has the power to interpret and then enforce a contract, then it is the court itself that is the “intelligent agent” and, in these cases, the doctrine on the matter defines them as Weak Smart Contracts which are distinguished from Strong Smart Contracts in which the legal consequences will occur independently of the intervention of traditional executors.


Strong Smart Contracts have processes or costs that inhibit or even make impossible switzerland email list their revocation or modification while Weak Smart Contracts do not.

The execution of a contract is nothing more than the fulfillment of what was agreed upon through a conditional stipulation: If A does B, then he has the right to C. If X does not do Y, then he will lose Z.

The central question is: who enforces the conditional stipulation? The most common enforcement comes from the parties themselves who comply with it voluntarily.

When people do not behave as they agreed to behave and do or fail to do something that breaks the deal, then it is necessary to involve a third party to interpret and enforce the contract. A did B and has a right to C, but X does not want to give it to him, so A asks J to force X to give him C.