But I think a human plus

[hasan018542]

I'm sure if you pulled a teenager off the street who knew nothing about this and asked them to write about it, they would probably produce something worse than this. But on the other hand, if you saw an article on the Moz blog or on another industry credible source, you'd expect something better than this. So yeah, I don't think that we're going to be using ChatGPT as our copywriter right away, but there may be some nuance, which I'll get to in just a bit.


What about writing descriptions though? I thought this was pretty good. uk email leads "Write a meta description for my Moz blog post about SEO predictions in 2023." Now I could do a lot better with the query here. I could tell it what my post is going to be about for starters so that it could write a more specific description. But this is already quite good. It's the right length for a meta description. It covers the bases.



It's inviting people to click. It makes it sound exciting. This is pretty good. Now you'd obviously want a human to review these for the factual issues we talked about before. the AI is going to be more effective here than just the human or at least more time efficient. So that's a potential use case. What about ideating copy? So I said that the pure ChatGPT written blog post wasn't great.